Brought to you by The Plaidcast
The question wasn’t complicated, but it left a noticeable pause in the room.
“If a horse is lame in the ring, who is responsible for making sure it doesn’t continue to show?”
At a recent Plaidcast In Person event, longtime judge, trainer, and international clinician Geoff Case didn’t hesitate with his answer: “In my view, the buck stops with the actual horsemen.”
But the conversation didn’t end there, because in today’s horse show landscape, responsibility for horse welfare isn’t always so clearly assigned. From class limits and unsound horses to legal concerns and ring dynamics, Case and other panelists peeled back the layers of a growing dilemma in modern competition: who actually protects the horse?
When Ethics Clash with Economics
Judges are trained to observe. To reward precision. To penalize error. And when necessary, to step in when something looks wrong. But when it comes to a horse showing obvious lameness, Case admitted the reality is murky.
“The truth is, a horse is either sound or it’s not. It’s not a spectrum,” he said. “But the minute you call a horse lame, there can be consequences. Legal ones.”
It’s happened before. At major events like Pony Finals and the Hampton Classic, judges have been sued after calling a horse unsound and eliminating it from competition. In those situations, even if the decision is correct, the cost of defending it can be tens of thousands of dollars.
That’s a huge burden for someone working a freelance job in a small judging booth, especially when they may not feel protected by horse show management or the governing body. “The stewards feel like the federations in general don’t have the backs of the stewards enough,” Case explained. “So the judge is often the last line of defense.”
The Schooling Ring Should Be the First Line of Defense
By current USEF protocol, if a horse appears unsound, the responsibility begins with the schooling supervisor. That person should report the issue to the steward, who communicates with management and the judge. But according to Case?
“That has never happened in my experience.”
Instead, it often falls on the judge in the ring who must weigh the ethics of eliminating a potentially lame horse against the legal and professional fallout that might follow. And if they’re watching a child or adult amateur pilot an unsound horse under the direction of a trainer?
“It’s horribly embarrassing for them,” Case said. “They’re out there to have fun. They may not even realize anything’s wrong.”
Unsafe Riding vs. Unsound Horses
Interestingly, Case said he feels more supported when penalizing unsafe riding than when calling a horse unsound.
“When it’s an obvious danger, like a horse that’s way too fresh or a rider clearly overmounted, it’s easier to justify intervention,” he explained. “That is fairly well received.”
But lameness remains a gray area. And it’s not just about ethics or fear of lawsuits. It’s about structure. The way horse shows are currently set up doesn’t always give officials the backing they need to act swiftly or definitively.
The Class Limit Debate: Can We Regulate Welfare?
One proposed solution for over-showing and burnout is class limits. Suggestions include placing a cap on the number of classes a horse can do in a day or week. It’s a growing conversation, especially online.
Case, who regularly officiates in both the U.S. and Europe, acknowledged that FEI competitions have stricter rules. “In Europe, the FEI typically limits horses to three classes per week, and usually just one class per day,” he said. “You don’t see horses going in 12 classes. It just doesn’t happen.”
But does that work for American shows, where a Crossrails pony and a Grand Prix horse may be stabled at the same venue? “Twelve walk-trot classes are not the same as twelve classes at 1.30 meters,” Case said. “You can’t paint this with a broad brush.”
He supports class limit discussions, but believes blanket regulations alone won’t solve the problem.
So… Who Does Protect the Horse?
Ideally, trainers would make the call. Case emphasized that if we were producing better horsemen and encouraging rider education many of these issues wouldn’t fall on judges and stewards.
“But that’s not always the world we live in,” he added. “Not when there’s pressure to win, to qualify, to show off an expensive horse.”
So the judge is often left to make the call without any guarantee of support.
From Cultural Shift to Structural Change
As much as riders and officials may want clear rules, Case argued that culture is the bigger issue. Regulation can only go so far. “We should be raising better horse people who make better decisions,” he said. “If we can do that, we’ll need fewer rules.”
Until then, the best protection for horses may not come from legislation or litigation, but from the courage of individuals willing to speak up—even when it’s hard.
For more insights and conversation, listen to the full Plaidcast 443: Plaidcast in Person with Jeff Papows, Geoff Case and Philip Richter. Subscribe to The Plaidcast on your favorite podcast platform for conversations with the most influential voices in the equestrian world.
